Publisher Correction: Learning relative values in the striatum induces violations of normative decision making
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Learning relative values in the striatum induces violations of normative decision making
To decide optimally between available options, organisms need to learn the values associated with these options. Reinforcement learning models offer a powerful explanation of how these values are learnt from experience. However, human choices often violate normative principles. We suggest that seemingly counterintuitive decisions may arise as a natural consequence of the learning mechanisms dep...
متن کاملParadoxes and Violations of Normative Decision Theory
Traditional economic decision theory proposes that people behave in certain ways when faced with a well-formulated set of alternatives and information. It is a normative theory; it suggests that people should act according to certain decision rules, but not that they will necessarily do so in reality. The standard assumption is that a person has a utility function over all possible outcomes, wh...
متن کاملExpectancies in Decision Making, Reinforcement Learning, and Ventral Striatum
Decisions can arise in different ways, such as from a gut feeling, doing what worked last time, or planful deliberation. Different decision-making systems are dissociable behaviorally, map onto distinct brain systems, and have different computational demands. For instance, "model-free" decision strategies use prediction errors to estimate scalar action values from previous experience, while "mo...
متن کاملNormative Target-Based Decision Making
This paper relates normative expected-utility decision making to target-based decision making, and introduces a new quantity, the aspiration equivalent. We show that using the aspiration equivalent as a target provides a new method for choosing between lotteries that is consistent with expected-utility maximization. Furthermore, we show that the aspirationequivalent target provides a win–win si...
متن کاملAbsolutely relative or relatively absolute: violations of value invariance in human decision making.
Making decisions based on relative rather than absolute information processing is tied to choice optimality via the accumulation of evidence differences and to canonical neural processing via accumulation of evidence ratios. These theoretical frameworks predict invariance of decision latencies to absolute intensities that maintain differences and ratios, respectively. While information about th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature Communications
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2041-1723
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10718-8